[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jun 2019 10:38:25 +0200 |
8 juni 2019 kl. 17.38 skrev Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>:
>
> How does this kind of thing work with an enclosing `cl-flet' or similar that
> redefines `memq' or whatever? Or in a file that redefines `memq' or whatever
> using `defun' or similar?
`cl-flet' works by macro-expansion, not by lexical rebinding of the function
value, so it should be reasonably safe.
monotonic
bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/18
bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/18
bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/18