|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms |
Date: | Sat, 8 Jun 2019 08:38:54 -0700 (PDT) |
How does this kind of thing work with an enclosing `cl-flet' or similar that redefines `memq' or whatever? Or in a file that redefines `memq' or whatever using `defun' or similar? (But I guess the same problem exists in the current code, wrt `eq' etc.?)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |