PSPP-BUG: Re: [bug #30389] REGRESSION crashes if the /VARIABLES list does not contain the dependent variable

[Charles Stangor]

Seems like the /VARIABLES subcommand is unnecessary in fact -- the needed 
variables can just be picked up from the /method and /dependent statements.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John Darrington" <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:38 AM
To: "Jason H Stover" <address@hidden>; "John Darrington" 
<address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; 
<address@hidden>
Subject: [bug #30389] REGRESSION crashes if the /VARIABLES list does not 
contain the dependent variable

> Follow-up Comment #2, bug #30389 (project pspp):
>
> It seems to work for me.
>
> I pushed an additional change to address a memory problem.
>
> Looking at the code, it's clear to me that we need more flexible
> framework for parsing lists of variables.  I found myself wanting the same
> thing when writing other commands.  We shouldn't have to spend so much 
> effort
> on the "housekeeping" when writing statistics.
>
> I'll see what I can do to make things a bit simpler.
>
>    _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
>  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30389>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Message sent via/by Savannah
>  http://savannah.gnu.org/