Re: [bug-gnulib] linebreak.h change

[Bruno Haible]

Karl Berry wrote:
> (I went through this with rms and moglen a while ago, plus reading up at
> the library of congress, etc.)

The citations from Moglen's mails, that you sent to gnu-prog-discuss on
2004-05-16, indicate that the issue is very weak. In particular he said
  "there is no need to comb
   the base of all our code looking for non-conforming instances."

There's no law that says that all years must be mentioned individually,
separated with commas.

For files that I maintain, I care about a pleasing and sensible look.

Bruno