[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10
From: |
Matthias Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10 |
Date: |
Mon, 9 May 2005 19:19:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.7i |
On Mon, May 09, 2005, Derek Price wrote:
[...]
> I did read this correctly in your report. If anyone else sees a need
> for an actual test for correct optind=0 behavior, then they are welcome
> to write one, but I decided the point was moot at the moment since
> detecting the "+" bug, just as valid as a means of selecting the GNU
> getopt() over the system one, was sufficient to avoid encountering any
> other bugs in the Solaris getopt().
I agree with you.
(mk)
--
Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47
>> Im prämotorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) <<
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Karl Berry, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10,
Matthias Kurz <=