[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2005 15:15:00 -0400 |
GNU getopt tries to do too much when it reorders the commandline and
therefor needs the "+" as a workaround.
I don't suppose it matters at this point, but I fail to see the
connection here. You can tell GNU getopt to REQUIRE_ORDER instead of
PERMUTE without using +, either directly or setting POSIXLY_CORRECT in
various ways. See the __ordering enum in getopt_int.h, for example.
(Seems like you probably already know this, so maybe it's unsuitable
somehow, if so, sorry for the noise.)
Also, I don't agree that it is "doing too much" to have PERMUTE be the
default for GNU. It is very useful for most programs. cvs has
exceptional command-line parsing needs.
Happy hacking,
karl
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Larry Jones, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Derek Price, 2005/05/09
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getopt and Solaris 10, Matthias Kurz, 2005/05/10