[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: missing dependency in *printf
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: missing dependency in *printf |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Apr 2007 02:00:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> It appears you forgot to commit this?
Yes. Done now.
> > Depends-on:
> > math
> > + fpucw
>
> And is there any reason you are undoing the alphabetic sort, other than that
> is
> what the file used to have before my patch?
Yes, keeping the natural order makes it easier to update the dependency list
when updating the lib/ source code. I do it by reading the source file from
top to bottom, like this:
# include <math.h> --> need math
# include "fpucw.h" --> need fpucw
If it's sorted alphabetically, I am more likely to do mistakes when doing
this task. And you?
Bruno
Re: missing dependency in *printf, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/03