Re: [PATCH] stdlib: support non-GCC __attribute__

[Jim Meyering]

Bruno Haible wrote:

> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> > Here's a proposed patch.
>>
>> That looks good as far as it goes,
>
> OK, here's a revised patch. Avoids the #ifndef now, and includes some 
> tests/*.c
> files.
>
>> but while we're at it,
>> shouldn't we use a consistent naming convention?
>> It's confusing that one .h file uses _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN and
>> another uses ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN, for the same notion.
>
> Good point. Here's a patch to rename these macros, so that they use the
> _GL_ prefix which we agreed a couple of months ago is the least risky.
>
> Objections to these patches? Jim? Paul?
...
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Don't interfere with a program's definition of 
> __attribute__.
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Consistent macro naming for macros that use GCC 
> __attribute__.

Fine by me.  I'll test once you push.
Thanks!