[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: warning options
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: warning options |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:58:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
I wrote:
> Thanks. I've updated my build script to include these for glibc/x86 builds
> (except -Werror, which causes a configuration error already in
> "checking whether the compiler works...").
But now I see the warnings coming out.
I won't use -Wold-style-definition and -Wstrict-prototypes because it leads
to pointless warnings in lib/:
glob.c:258:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
glob.c:1096:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
glob.c:1193:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
glob.c:1232:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
fatal-signal.c:135:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype
[-Wstrict-prototypes]
fatal-signal.c:135:1: warning: old-style function definition
[-Wold-style-definition]
fatal-signal.c:180:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype
[-Wstrict-prototypes]
fatal-signal.c:180:1: warning: old-style function definition
[-Wold-style-definition]
fatal-signal.c:254:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype
[-Wstrict-prototypes]
fatal-signal.c:254:1: warning: old-style function definition
[-Wold-style-definition]
fatal-signal.c:274:1: warning: old-style function definition
[-Wold-style-definition]
fatal-signal.c:282:1: warning: old-style function definition
[-Wold-style-definition]
and hundreds of warnings in tests/. Most of them pointless, because an empty
function argument list (in a function definition!) is equivalent to (void).
Nothing to warn about.
I also won't use -Wunused-macros since it produces warnings that are pointless
to fix:
printf-frexp.c:63:0: warning: macro "L_" is not used
tempname.c:70:0: warning: macro "__open64" is not used
tempname.c:72:0: warning: macro "__xstat64" is not used
fnmatch.c:171:0: warning: macro "STRCOLL" is not used
fnmatch.c:199:0: warning: macro "STRCOLL" is not used
fnmatch.c:91:0: warning: macro "STREQ" is not used
getcwd.c:86:0: warning: macro "__opendir" is not used
glob.c:148:0: warning: macro "__stat" is not used
glob.c:151:0: warning: macro "__readdir64" is not used
glob.c:73:0: warning: macro "DIRENT_MUST_BE" is not used
strerror_r.c:23:0: warning: macro "_NETBSD_SOURCE" is not used
vasnprintf.c:145:0: warning: macro "DCHAR_SET" is not used
vasnprintf.c:210:0: warning: macro "remainder" is not used
vasnprintf.c:208:0: warning: macro "exp" is not used
vasnprintf.c:273:0: warning: macro "decimal_point_char_defined" is not used
-Wstrict-overflow give spurious warnings with gcc 4.5:
utimecmp.c:279:14: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when
simplifying conditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow]
Even -Wshadow fires back unreasonably:
fma.c:393:26: warning: declaration of ‘yn’ shadows a global declaration
[-Wshadow]
And -Wtype-limits warnings in dead code are not useful either:
fma.c:172:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
[-Wtype-limits]
fma.c:210:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
[-Wtype-limits]
fma.c:248:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
[-Wtype-limits]
The fallout is small:
2011-11-20 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
fma: Remove unused code.
* lib/fma.c (DECL_ROUNDING, BEGIN_ROUNDING, END_ROUNDING): Remove
unused macros.
--- lib/fma.c.orig Sun Nov 20 15:51:09 2011
+++ lib/fma.c Sun Nov 20 15:44:00 2011
@@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
# define LDEXP ldexpl
# define MIN_EXP LDBL_MIN_EXP
# define MANT_BIT LDBL_MANT_BIT
-# define DECL_ROUNDING DECL_LONG_DOUBLE_ROUNDING
-# define BEGIN_ROUNDING() BEGIN_LONG_DOUBLE_ROUNDING ()
-# define END_ROUNDING() END_LONG_DOUBLE_ROUNDING ()
# define L_(literal) literal##L
#elif ! defined USE_FLOAT
# define FUNC fma
@@ -52,9 +49,6 @@
# define LDEXP ldexp
# define MIN_EXP DBL_MIN_EXP
# define MANT_BIT DBL_MANT_BIT
-# define DECL_ROUNDING
-# define BEGIN_ROUNDING()
-# define END_ROUNDING()
# define L_(literal) literal
#else /* defined USE_FLOAT */
# define FUNC fmaf
@@ -63,9 +57,6 @@
# define LDEXP ldexpf
# define MIN_EXP FLT_MIN_EXP
# define MANT_BIT FLT_MANT_BIT
-# define DECL_ROUNDING
-# define BEGIN_ROUNDING()
-# define END_ROUNDING()
# define L_(literal) literal##f
#endif
--
In memoriam Kerem Yılmazer <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerem_Yılmazer>
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Simon Josefsson, 2011/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Ben Pfaff, 2011/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Simon Josefsson, 2011/11/20
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Peter Johansson, 2011/11/20
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/20
- Re: [PATCH] tests: factor st_ctime-comparison out of two headers, Ben Pfaff, 2011/11/20
- Re: warning options,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: warning options, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/20
- Re: warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/20
- Re: warning options, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/21
- Re: warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/27
- Re: warning options, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/28