|
| From: | Bruno Haible |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:29:31 +0200 |
| User-agent: | KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-157-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Eric Blake wrote: > +#if SOCK_CLOEXEC > + if (flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK) Why '#if SOCK_CLOEXEC'? Why not '#if SOCK_NONBLOCK'? Bruno
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |