[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:32:57 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 8/20/19 2:29 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> +#if SOCK_CLOEXEC
>> + if (flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK)
>
> Why '#if SOCK_CLOEXEC'?
> Why not '#if SOCK_NONBLOCK'?
Because I made a typo. Thanks for spotting it; will fix shortly.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined, Eric Blake, 2019/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined, Eric Blake, 2019/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined, Richard W.M. Jones, 2019/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined, Bruno Haible, 2019/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined,
Eric Blake <=