Re: pthread headers

[Marcus Brinkmann]

At Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:48:24 +0200,
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <antti-juhani@kaijanaho.info> wrote:
> 
> [1  <multipart/signed (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On 20050111T174249+0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> >    I would expect GCC to eventually fix its inline handling to conform with
> >    C99 
> > 
> > The problem isn't C99, but C90, __inline is handled differently than
> > inline by gcc.  The former works even with -ansi enabled.
> 
> I was under the impression that __inline is an alias for inline, with no
> semantic differences.  If I'm correct, then extern __inline will change
> semantics when extern inline does.

Yes, this is likely, see also the file CONFORMANCE in the glibc source tree.

We can probably just piggy-back on glibc on this issue, and ignore it
until it is fixed there.

Thanks,
Marcus