[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pthread headers
From: |
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho |
Subject: |
Re: pthread headers |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:25:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On 20050111T190536-0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
> Why will extern inline change? I haven't seen anything in the gcc
> documentation to indicate any changes to extern inline.
Because the current semantics of inline are in conflict with what C99
specifies. The current GCC semantics and C99 semantics are the same
when inline is used with static, but other uses of inline will get a
semantics change when GCC is finally changed to conform to C99 inline
semantics.
(It is conceivable that in -ansi mode __inline__ will still use the
current GNU semantics, but I wouldn't bet on it.)
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.info/
Blogi - http://kaijanaho.info/antti-juhani/blog/
Toys - http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: pthread headers, (continued)
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, James A. Morrison, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers,
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <=
- Re: pthread headers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
Re: pthread headers, pietro, 2005/01/11
Re: pthread headers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/12