[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grub vs st_dev (aka fsid) / st_rdev
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: grub vs st_dev (aka fsid) / st_rdev |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:57:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 00:23:17 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > - Either we align more on POSIX to manage to get the st_dev (aka fsid)
> > of filesystems equal to the the st_rdev of their underlying /dev
> > entries. An easy way is to have storeios expose their own pid as
> > st_rdev, and have filesystems use the underlying storeio st_rdev for
> > their st_dev (aka fsid). One issue is for the / ext2fs, since it
> > doesn't use a storeio, and a storeio could be started later.
>
> I don't see how this is a problem specific to "/"... AIUI, it would be
> possible to start another storeio for a store that already has one just
> the same.
Yes, this was explained after in the thread. My concern was that for "/"
ext2fs doesn't even talk to any storeio.
Samuel
Re: grub vs st_dev (aka fsid) / st_rdev, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/10
- Re: grub vs st_dev (aka fsid) / st_rdev,
Samuel Thibault <=