[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mercurial vs. git
From: |
Michael Banck |
Subject: |
Re: Mercurial vs. git |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:16:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Well, there's Photoshop - and it doesn't yet have a real competitor in free
> software. Though Gimp is almost as powerful, it is much harder to use for
> newcomers. Give Photoshop to a newbie, and you'll see him/her working at
> once.
> Try that with Gimp, and after a few minutes you'll have a confused user.
I am getting increasingly annoyed by this - can you explain how this
relates to Hurd development?
Michael
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/03
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/04
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/08
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/09
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Michal Suchanek, 2009/11/09
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/10
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Michal Suchanek, 2009/11/11
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/11
- Re: Mercurial vs. git,
Michael Banck <=
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/12
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/14