[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mercurial vs. git
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Mercurial vs. git |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:47:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 16:16:53 schrieb Michael Banck:
> I am getting increasingly annoyed by this - can you explain how this
> relates to Hurd development?
I only sent it to the list, because it seemed to me that it was interesting to
not only olaf and me - but your reaction means, I waited too long before
taking it offlist.
Sorry for that.
It's offlist from now on.
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/03
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/04
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/08
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/09
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Michal Suchanek, 2009/11/09
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/10
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Michal Suchanek, 2009/11/11
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/11
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, Michael Banck, 2009/11/11
- Re: Mercurial vs. git,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
- Re: Mercurial vs. git, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/14