[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Introduce gsync-based locks to glibc.
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Introduce gsync-based locks to glibc. |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:12:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 21 Aug 2016 02:32:58 +0200, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 22:41:37 +0200, wrote:
> > The good news is that there are only half a dozen test regressions.
>
> The even more good news is that these are most probably actually due to
> a bogus DNS resolution configuration on my system :)
But some of these are really due to the patch. It seems that it's due
to the libc_specific change. That shows once again how mixing several
things in the same patch makes debugging regressions harder...
Samuel