Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-tar (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu Mar 30 2006 21:57:36 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 30, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Bdale Garbee, 21:57
  • Re: [Bug-tar] non-zero response from gtar, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:42
  • [Bug-tar] non-zero response from gtar, Les King, 04:35
• March 27, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Bdale Garbee, 12:44
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Tar Verify, Paul Eggert, 12:08
• March 26, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Paul Eggert, 02:54
• March 25, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Martin Michlmayr, 17:38
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Bdale Garbee, 17:25
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Sergey Poznyakoff, 11:13
• March 22, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] bug in tar, Joerg Schilling, 11:32
  • Re: [Bug-tar] multiv04.at, Sergey Poznyakoff, 10:51
  • Re: [Bug-tar] bug in tar, Sergey Poznyakoff, 10:51
  • RE: [Bug-tar] Tar Verify, Toby Moxham, 08:39
  • [Bug-tar] bug in tar, Stephan Litterst, 08:39
  • [Bug-tar] multiv04.at, EXCOFFIER, Denis (CS SYSTEMES INFORMATION), 08:39
• March 21, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] tar fails to extract large sparse archive member, Sergey Poznyakoff, 16:59
  • Re: [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental, Joerg Schilling, 16:50
  • [Bug-tar] tar fails to extract large sparse archive member, Peter Vrabec, 08:37
• March 20, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Paul Eggert, 11:43
  • Re: [Bug-tar] tar and gzip, Helmut Waitzmann, 11:30
  • Re: [Bug-tar] creat-safer vs. text mode platforms, Joerg Schilling, 11:28
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Tar Verify, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:20
  • [Bug-tar] Tar Verify, Toby Moxham, 03:52
• March 19, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Paul Eggert, 15:41
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:18
• March 18, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] VPATH build buglet, Paul Eggert, 23:05
• March 17, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental, Helmut Waitzmann, 13:32
  • [Bug-tar] VPATH build buglet, Ralf Wildenhues, 11:18
  • Re: [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Sergey Poznyakoff, 11:11
  • [Bug-tar] GFDL unmodifiable sections in info, Bdale Garbee, 10:48
• March 16, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Re: This apparent 63-character remote tarfilepath limit, Joerg Schilling, 12:41
  • Re: [Bug-tar] This apparent 63-character remote tarfilepath limit, Joerg Schilling, 12:38
  • Re: [Bug-tar] is genfile meant to be a user program?, Joerg Schilling, 12:15
  • [Bug-tar] Re: creat-safer vs. text mode platforms, Paul Eggert, 02:04
  • [Bug-tar] creat-safer vs. text mode platforms, Eric Blake, 00:40
• March 15, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 17:35
  • Re: [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental, John R. Vanderpool, 17:19
  • Re: [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 17:02
  • [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental, John R. Vanderpool, 16:16
  • Re: [Bug-tar] tar and gzip, Phillip Susi, 16:15
  • [Bug-tar] gzip tar issue, John R. Vanderpool, 15:51
  • [Bug-tar] tar and gzip, christophe . kirch, 14:34
• March 14, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] --listed-incremental woes again, Sergey Poznyakoff, 09:38
  • Re: [Bug-tar] --listed-incremental woes again, Sergey Poznyakoff, 03:36
• March 13, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] --listed-incremental woes again, John R. Vanderpool, 13:22
• March 12, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] Re: This apparent 63-character remote tarfilepath limit, Paul Eggert, 02:20
• March 11, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] Re: This apparent 63-character remote tarfilepath limit, Sergey Poznyakoff, 17:40
  • [Bug-tar] This apparent 63-character remote tarfilepath limit, Ed Leaver, 17:34
  • Re: [Bug-tar] is genfile meant to be a user program?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 10:32
  • Re: [Bug-tar] is genfile meant to be a user program?, Benno Schulenberg, 10:06
• March 10, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] [GNU tar 1.15.90] testsuite: 30 44 failed, Sergey Poznyakoff, 15:41
  • Re: [Bug-tar] is genfile meant to be a user program?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 15:36
  • [Bug-tar] [GNU tar 1.15.90] testsuite: 30 44 failed, chenxf, 15:32
  • [Bug-tar] GNU tar output, Tim Bedding, 15:31
  • [Bug-tar] Re: GNU tar output, Sergey Poznyakoff, 15:30
  • [Bug-tar] Re: GNU tar output, Sergey Poznyakoff, 15:28
  • [Bug-tar] Relative or no path at all in a tar archive?, Angel Tsankov, 07:54
• March 09, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] Cannot explain this gnutar behaviour please observe., Robert Nicholson, 23:08
  • [Bug-tar] Problem using -X and -N together with gnutar?, Robert Nicholson, 22:09
• March 08, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] is genfile meant to be a user program?, Benno Schulenberg, 16:24
  • [Bug-tar] [patch] small corrections to tar.texi, Benno Schulenberg, 15:31
  • [Bug-tar] [patch] consistent lowercase --help messages, Benno Schulenberg, 15:23
• March 07, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] lib/.cvsignore undo unistd_.h, Paul Eggert, 21:01
  • [Bug-tar] tar archive buffer was not page-aligned?, Paul Eggert, 19:58
  • [Bug-tar] paxutils minor cleanups for time, sys/time.h, valloc, Paul Eggert, 19:30
  • [Bug-tar] lib/.cvsignore change for new gnulib unistd module, Paul Eggert, 19:25
• March 06, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions, yamu wasp, 16:36
• March 05, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Option to disable or change device number checking., Sergey Poznyakoff, 03:34
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions, Sergey Poznyakoff, 03:16
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions, Paul Eggert, 03:03
• March 04, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Option to disable or change device number checking., Rob Browning, 20:39
  • Re: [Bug-tar] Option to disable or change device number checking., Rob Browning, 20:37
  • [Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions, yamu wasp, 15:15
  • Re: [Bug-tar] [GNU tar 1.15.90] testsuite: 35 failed, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:54
  • Re: [Bug-tar] avoid spurious test failure (working --listed), #24, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:43
  • Re: [Bug-tar] --exclude flagg documentation unclear, and possibly incorrect, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:36
  • Re: [Bug-tar] when & why did -cv start printing the leading /, Sergey Poznyakoff, 03:08
• March 03, 2006
  • [Bug-tar] when & why did -cv start printing the leading /, John R. Vanderpool, 22:08
  • [Bug-tar] [GNU tar 1.15.90] testsuite: 35 failed, Bruno Haible, 20:53
• March 02, 2006
  • Re: [Bug-tar] avoid spurious test failure (working --listed), #24, Paul Eggert, 12:33
  • [Bug-tar] --exclude flagg documentation unclear, and possibly incorrect, Chris Moore, 03:20

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc