Re: [Bug-tar] more on woes with --listed-incremental

[John R. Vanderpool]

> John R. Vanderpool <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > if i revert back to straight tar-1.15.2-20060210 the above simple example
> > does not do the wrong thing anymore;

Sergey Poznyakoff writes...
> 
> Are you sure? When I try your example on tar-1.15.2-20060210 I always get
> 
> ./
> ./a/
> tar: ./a.tar: file is the archive; not dumped
> ./a/y

thanx for the fast response!

you're right it does do it when i go back to straight tar-1.15.2-20060210
also, not sure how i missed that (it actually was a bit perplexing when
i thought that it didn't do it)

bottom line, the behavior is not right correct?

here is the test case in easier to read format:

mkdir a
touch a/x a/y
gtar -c -v -f foo.tar -g incrlis ./
/bin/rm a/x
gtar -c -v -f foo.tar -g incrlis ./