Re: [Chicken-users] future of chicken?

[felix]

> >Have you checked out GOO (was "Proto")? The current implementation is
> >somewhat
> >unwieldly (as far as I have tested it), but I like the syntax. It's
> >quite
> >concise and throws away much stuff, that isn't used that much anyway.
>
>        I've not seen that.  It still seems that Chicken will be
>easier to corrupt. :)  We liked that it had a working compiler.  But
>I'll check this out some more, too.  Thanks for the pointer.
>


You are happily invited to corrupt it as you please... ;-)


cheers,
felix