[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg
From: |
Joerg F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg |
Date: |
15 Nov 2003 18:42:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
> >> I've added Tony Garnock-Jones GNU readline interface
> >> to the eggs collection:
> >
> > Thanks for doing this!
> >
> >> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/readline.html
Just for info, since I learned to know about
http://utopia.knoware.nl/~hlub/uck/rlwrap
I personaly prefer it over linking to readline. YMMV.
> (actually, *must* code that links to GPLd libraries be GPLd
> as well? Anyway, GPL is of course fine)
Yes, that's a GPL requirement.
However my 0,02 cent: The linking requirement itself is really
outdated, especially when you consider how in memory compilation could
nullify the practical effect.
At the other hand, the spirit behind clearly is: no none-GPL software
may ever depend on GPLed components. Hence the resulting programm
shall be GPL, if any _required_ component is GPL.
/Jörg
--
The worst of harm may often result from the best of intentions.
- [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg, felix, 2003/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg, Category 5, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg, Felix Winkelmann, 2003/11/20
- [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, Joerg F. Wittenberger, 2003/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, felix, 2003/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, Joerg F. Wittenberger, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, Felix Winkelmann, 2003/11/24