[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] chicken generates bad C code here
From: |
Joerg F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] chicken generates bad C code here |
Date: |
22 Nov 2003 15:48:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
sorry to follow up immediately, but it appears that the problem is
related to the use of -hygienic !
"Joerg F. Wittenberger" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Here is a snippet from generated code and the related source parts. I
> could imagine, that the problem is obvious to you from these parts;
> tell me if you need a complete example.
>
> t22=C_mutate((C_word*)lf[112]+1,(*a=C_CLOSURE_TYPE|1,a[1]=(C_word)f_4345,tmp=(C_word)a,a+=2,tmp));
> t23=C_mutate((C_word*)lf[223]+1,C_retrieve(lf[220]));
> t24=C_mutate((C_word*)lf[111]+1,(*a=C_CLOSURE_TYPE|1,a[1]=(C_word)f_4380,tmp=(C_word)a,a+=2,tmp));
> t25=C_mutate((C_word*)lf[224]+1,C_retrieve(lf[225]));
> t26=C_mutate((C_word*)lf[226]+1,(*a=C_CLOSURE_TYPE|1,a[1]=(C_word)(quote
> A_addstr5),tmp=(C_word)a,a+=2,tmp));
>
> /* Note: "(quote A_addstr5)" instead of "A_addstr5" here */
--
The worst of harm may often result from the best of intentions.
- [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg, felix, 2003/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg, Category 5, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] GNU readline egg, Felix Winkelmann, 2003/11/20
- [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, Joerg F. Wittenberger, 2003/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, felix, 2003/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, Joerg F. Wittenberger, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] are standard bindings write protected?, Felix Winkelmann, 2003/11/24