[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy
From: |
Michele Simionato |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2005 13:21:25 -0400 |
On 5/25/05, Graham Fawcett <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 5/25/05, Michele Simionato <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I think to get a remote REPL is not difficult, but I have serious doubts
> > about getting better tracebacks, since I have never seen a Scheme
> > implementation with good error reporting :-(
> >
> > Guido van Rossum says that he will never make Python tail recursive
> > since it does not want to lose nice tracebacks. I don't know if it is
> > technically
> > possible to get both tail recursion and nice tracebacks, and how difficult
> > it is.
>
> I feared that might be the case. Still, any tool that could instrument
> my code to provide some kind of "this source-snippet is probably the
> problem" report would be beneficial. Maybe I need to do some reading
> on Scheme debuggers...
You may start from
# chicken-setup debug
and see how far you can go.
Michele Simionato
RE: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Dominique Boucher, 2005/05/25
Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 2005/05/26