Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue May 31 2005 08:37:27 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• May 31, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compilers vs. interpreters, William Annis, 08:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] how do I send input to an external program line-by-line?, Michele Simionato, 06:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] how do I send input to an external program line-by-line?, Thomas Chust, 05:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compilers vs. interpreters, felix winkelmann, 03:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compilers vs. interpreters, Nicolas Pelletier, 03:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compilers vs. interpreters, Peter Bex, 03:13
  • [Chicken-users] how do I send input to an external program line-by-line?, Michele Simionato, 02:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] [patch] libc regex case-insensitivity, felix winkelmann, 01:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compilers vs. interpreters, Michele Simionato, 00:13
• May 30, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Compilers vs. interpreters, Ed Watkeys, 22:14
  • [Chicken-users] [patch] libc regex case-insensitivity, Zbigniew, 17:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] what happened to define-structure in the pattern matching module?, Michele Simionato, 04:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] what happened to define-structure in the pattern matching module?, felix winkelmann, 04:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Michele Simionato, 04:15
  • [Chicken-users] what happened to define-structure in the pattern matching module?, Michele Simionato, 03:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, felix winkelmann, 03:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, felix winkelmann, 03:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Michele Simionato, 03:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!, felix winkelmann, 02:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Michele Simionato, 02:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, felix winkelmann, 02:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!, felix winkelmann, 02:17
  • [Chicken-users] sqlite egg, Michele Simionato, 02:00
• May 29, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!, Peter Bex, 07:42
  • [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!, Michele Simionato, 07:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!, felix winkelmann, 06:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] how to get cookies working for pages defined via define-http-resource, felix winkelmann, 05:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Peter Bex, 05:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Michele Simionato, 04:04
  • [Chicken-users] can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!, Michele Simionato, 02:55
• May 28, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Peter Bex, 08:33
  • [Chicken-users] how to get cookies working for pages defined via define-http-resource, Michele Simionato, 02:21
  • [Chicken-users] making lambdas more introspective, Michele Simionato, 01:45
• May 27, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] hostinfo egg, Zbigniew, 22:50
  • [Chicken-users] New eggs and current chicken status, felix winkelmann, 17:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 16:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Mario Domenech Goulart, 10:04
  • [Chicken-users] Re: is define-http-resource converting POST into GET?, Michele Simionato, 05:22
  • [Chicken-users] Re: is define-http-resource converting POST into GET?, Michele Simionato, 05:05
  • [Chicken-users] is define-http-resource converting POST into GET?, Michele Simionato, 05:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] inter-thread communication, Michele Simionato, 02:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] inter-thread communication, felix winkelmann, 01:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 01:47
  • [Chicken-users] inter-thread communication, Michele Simionato, 01:32
• May 26, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Mario Domenech Goulart, 15:53
  • RE: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Dominique Boucher, 09:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] session handling with Spiffy, Michele Simionato, 06:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] session handling with Spiffy, Peter Bex, 06:36
  • [Chicken-users] session handling with Spiffy, Michele Simionato, 05:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 05:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Peter Busser, 05:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Sunnan, 05:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] url-encoded arguments et similia, felix winkelmann, 04:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Magnus Therning, 03:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] url-encoded arguments et similia, Michele Simionato, 03:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] url-encoded arguments et similia, Michele Simionato, 03:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] url-encoded arguments et similia, felix winkelmann, 03:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 02:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 02:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 02:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 02:25
  • [Chicken-users] url-encoded arguments et similia, Michele Simionato, 02:16
  • [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI 43: Vector library implementation, felix winkelmann, 01:58
• May 25, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] SRFI 43: Vector library implementation, Zbigniew, 15:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Graham Fawcett, 14:59
  • RE: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Dominique Boucher, 14:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Michele Simionato, 14:04
  • RE: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Dominique Boucher, 13:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Michele Simionato, 13:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Graham Fawcett, 12:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Graham Fawcett, 12:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Michele Simionato, 11:53
  • [Chicken-users] an ode to Spiffy, Michele Simionato, 07:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] experimenting with http-server, felix winkelmann, 03:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] experimenting with http-server, Michele Simionato, 03:00
  • Re: [Chicken-users] experimenting with http-server, felix winkelmann, 01:47
• May 24, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] experimenting with http-server, Michele Simionato, 13:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] "Go to parent directory" in spiffy's default directory listing, felix winkelmann, 04:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Avoiding transitively using macros?, felix winkelmann, 03:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ffi questions and bug (?), felix winkelmann, 02:44
• May 23, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Garbage collection, Zbigniew, 12:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Garbage collection, felix winkelmann, 09:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Egg documentation, felix winkelmann, 09:40
  • [Chicken-users] Egg documentation, Zbigniew, 00:46
• May 22, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] 2nd CALL FOR PAPERS: ACM SIGPLAN 2005 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming, Michael Sperber, 14:47
• May 21, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Garbage collection, Zbigniew, 17:40
  • [Chicken-users] "Go to parent directory" in spiffy's default directory listing, Guy Banay, 03:53
  • [Chicken-users] Avoiding transitively using macros?, Reed Sheridan, 01:16
• May 20, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ffi questions and bug (?), Carlos Pita, 14:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, Greg Buchholz, 11:07
  • [Chicken-users] Scheme UK Meeting: 1 June 2005, Noel Welsh, 05:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ffi questions and bug (?), felix winkelmann, 05:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, felix winkelmann, 05:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, felix winkelmann, 02:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, Michele Simionato, 02:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, Michele Simionato, 02:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, felix winkelmann, 02:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ffi questions and bug (?), felix winkelmann, 01:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, Michele Simionato, 00:10
• May 19, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, Alex Shinn, 23:14
  • [Chicken-users] match-let and hygiene incompatible?, Greg Buchholz, 19:59
  • [Chicken-users] ffi questions and bug (?), Carlos Pita, 17:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, F. Wittenberger, 06:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, F. Wittenberger, 05:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, Michele Simionato, 05:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, felix winkelmann, 04:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, Michele Simionato, 04:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, felix winkelmann, 04:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, Michele Simionato, 04:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, Michele Simionato, 04:07
• May 18, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, felix winkelmann, 17:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] regex issues, felix winkelmann, 17:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, felix winkelmann, 17:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] regex issues, Christian Jaeger, 16:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, Chris Double, 16:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] regex issues, Zbigniew, 12:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] regex issues, felix winkelmann, 09:15
  • [Chicken-users] hash-table with missing keys, Michele Simionato, 05:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, Michele Simionato, 03:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, felix winkelmann, 02:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] regex issues, felix winkelmann, 02:12
• May 17, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] regex issues, Zbigniew, 20:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Zbigniew, 12:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, felix winkelmann, 09:26
  • [Chicken-users] serialization of functions, closures, continuations, Michele Simionato, 00:55
• May 16, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] regex issues, Christian Jaeger, 19:58
• May 15, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Zbigniew, 04:07
• May 14, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OT: Scheme community?, felix winkelmann, 11:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, felix winkelmann, 11:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, felix winkelmann, 11:01
• May 13, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Zbigniew, 23:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, Zbigniew, 21:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, Zbigniew, 21:03
  • [Chicken-users] OT: Scheme community?, Greg Buchholz, 15:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] simple macroexpand query, felix winkelmann, 01:53
• May 12, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] simple macroexpand query, Graham Fawcett, 16:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] simple macroexpand query, Greg Buchholz, 14:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] simple macroexpand query, Dale Jordan, 13:51
  • [Chicken-users] simple macroexpand query, Greg Buchholz, 13:35
• May 11, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] More idomatic code (Language Shootout), felix winkelmann, 14:37
  • [Chicken-users] More idomatic code (Language Shootout), Greg Buchholz, 12:03
• May 09, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help with problem involving GC mixing C/Scheme, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 07:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, felix winkelmann, 02:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help with problem involving GC mixing C/Scheme, felix winkelmann, 02:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, felix winkelmann, 01:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, felix winkelmann, 01:17
• May 07, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 18:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 18:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 18:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Graham Fawcett, 17:41
  • [Chicken-users] Help with problem involving GC mixing C/Scheme, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 14:30
  • [Chicken-users] Return multiple values from foreign-lambda*, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 12:35
• May 06, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, Graham Fawcett, 09:35
• May 05, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] usleep?, felix winkelmann, 19:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, felix winkelmann, 19:01
  • [Chicken-users] Multithreading test, Eric Merritt, 18:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem compiling static executable on Mac OS X, felix winkelmann, 18:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with string-match?, felix winkelmann, 18:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup on freebsd, felix winkelmann, 18:30
  • [Chicken-users] Problem compiling static executable on Mac OS X, Henrik Tramberend, 14:52
  • [Chicken-users] New/updated eggs: stream-wiki, stream-parser, stream-ext, html-stream, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 14:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem compiling static executable on Mac OS X, Henrik Tramberend, 14:18
  • [Chicken-users] usleep?, Graham Fawcett, 12:21
• May 04, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] chicken-setup on freebsd, Toby Butzon, 18:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem compiling static executable on Mac OS X, Kon Lovett, 13:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, Graham Fawcett, 12:12
• May 03, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, felix winkelmann, 22:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] NAN & INF, felix winkelmann, 22:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] NAN & INF, felix winkelmann, 22:56
  • [Chicken-users] Problem with string-match?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 22:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, Graham Fawcett, 16:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, Graham Fawcett, 11:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, felix winkelmann, 10:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem compiling static executable on Mac OS X, felix winkelmann, 02:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with finalizers?, felix winkelmann, 02:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with Sandbox egg, felix winkelmann, 02:47
• May 02, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Problem compiling static executable on Mac OS X, Henrik Tramberend, 15:07
  • [Chicken-users] Win32 COM with Chicken?, Graham Fawcett, 13:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] html-stream: idiom for large iterations?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 12:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] html-stream: idiom for large iterations?, Graham Fawcett, 12:51
• May 01, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with finalizers?, John Lenz, 18:33
  • [Chicken-users] NAN & INF, Kon Lovett, 13:30
  • [Chicken-users] Problem with Sandbox egg, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 13:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] html-stream: idiom for large iterations?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 12:24
  • [Chicken-users] Problem with finalizers?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 12:12

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc