Re: [Chicken-users] Re: https

[Thomas Chust]

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, DaishiKato wrote:

> [...] Thanks. This looks good. I would implement it in 
> http:send-request, though.

Hello,

I just decided against patching the http-client internals themselves for 
the "proof of concept" example. Writing a new version of http:GET was less 
invasive.

> Let me work on it, based on your code (if 
> there's no license conflict), and I will come up with a patch.

Sure, go ahead and use the code. If the stuff was to become or be included 
in an egg, I would put it under a BSD license as usual.

> BTW, I'm still not sure about the use of http:request-ip. Your code 
> indicates that is a replacement of host, but it will not work since the 
> default value is "<unknown>". [...]

Hmm, that's right. Maybe it should not be used at all then, or only if it 
does contain a string matching "\\([0-9]{1,3}\\.\\){3}[0-9]{1,3}".

cu,
Thomas