Re: [Chicken-users] SAFE vs. UNSAFE .exports

[felix winkelmann]

On 6/1/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
> This evening I added .exports support to the CMake build.  I notice that
> the .exports emission in various .scm files have the same name for both
> SAFE and UNSAFE libraries.  I am wondering if this can clobber
> anything.  In any event, from a CMake build standpoint, the SAFE and
> UNSAFE libraries are scribbling on each other's .exports.  I hope
> they're scribbling exactly the same thing.  If not, then .exports need
> to emit different names when compiled UNSAFE.

Yes, you are actually right. Both safe and unsafe should generate
identical files, but the unsafe ones don't need it. I'll cond-expand
the declarations in the library files. Thanks for mentioning this.

BTW, do you think of adding nursery sampling to the cmake build?
You'll probably have to compile a wrapper program to extract
the timing information.


(felix)