[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] static or dynamic nursery
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] static or dynamic nursery |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:30:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:30:39PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> One can skip the nursery sampling and just chose 64 or 128k
> (which seems to be the optimum for current machines). It's not crucial,
> but may give slightly better performance.
>
> Building chicken from sources is still the recommended method - to use
> chicken effectively, one has to work on that level anyway, IMHO.
> That doesn't mean binary releases aren't useful, of course. Especially
> bootstrapping issues can be handled better that way.
I'm not very familiar with Chicken's sources, but would it be possible
to dynamically set the nursery size based on an environment variable?
This would solve binary distribution problems.
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpd6bJOnQhXn.pgp
Description: PGP signature