Re: [Chicken-users] makefile.vc is not NMAKE

chicken-users

From:	felix winkelmann
Subject:	Re: [Chicken-users] makefile.vc is not NMAKE
Date:	Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:17:19 +0200

On 6/9/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:


makefile.vc is not a NMAKE file.  It's a Unix makefile.


No, it's specifically written for nmake. I don't know what makes
you think it isn't.


(felix)

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, felix winkelmann, 2006/06/07
  - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/06/07
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/06/07
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, Frank, 2006/06/07
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/06/07
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, Frank, 2006/06/10
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, John Cowan, 2006/06/10
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/06/10
    - Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens, felix winkelmann, 2006/06/09
    - [Chicken-users] makefile.vc is not NMAKE, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/06/09
    - Re: [Chicken-users] makefile.vc is not NMAKE, felix winkelmann <=
    - Re: [Chicken-users] makefile.vc is NMAKE, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/06/09
    - Re: [Chicken-users] makefile.vc is NMAKE, felix winkelmann, 2006/06/09