[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:48:39 +0200 |
A general question to all list members:
The multiude of regex engines is both a pain for building and
using chicken, as the regex-flavors are never quite the same
and handling the different cases gets tedious quickly.
What do others think about adding one regex library for
alll platforms? It must be BSD licensed. Currently there
are two candidates which look interesting:
- PCRE
- Oniguruma (very powerful, but also very big)
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Michele Simionato, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Kon Lovett, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Graham Fawcett, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, John Cowan, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Zbigniew, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/07