[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:19:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
felix winkelmann scripsit:
> What do others think about adding one regex library for
> alll platforms? It must be BSD licensed. Currently there
> are two candidates which look interesting:
>
> - PCRE
Absolutely go with PCRE. It's an excellent implementation,
and Perl5-compatibility is expected in regex libraries nowadays.
--
Andrew Watt on Microsoft: John Cowan
Never in the field of human computing address@hidden
has so much been paid by so many http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to so few! (pace Winston Churchill)
- [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, felix winkelmann, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Michele Simionato, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Kon Lovett, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Graham Fawcett, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Zbigniew, 2006/07/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/07