Re: [Chicken-users] macro systems and chicken (long)

[Alaric Snell-Pym]

> "define-record-type" (SRFI-9) should be sufficient. The problem is
> that
> it is not that easy to construct identifiers in hygienic macros (or
> it probably
> is, I don't know, I haven't thought about it very much, yet. There
> are many
> loose ends in the moment since so much changes).

It shouldn't be a problem - just (string->symbol (string-append
(symbol->string record-name) "-" (symbol->string slot-name))) or
whatever as usual and then don't explicitly rename it, I reckon.

> cheers,
> felix

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/
Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
Blog: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/?author=4