Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic branch (progress report, sort of)

[Alaric Snell-Pym]

On 14 May 2008, at 3:52 pm, felix winkelmann wrote:

> This hygienic chicken represents in my humble opinion the direction
> into
> which chicken should go. It breaks with backward compatibility in
> quite
> a number of points and will require major effort to port all eggs
> to (some
> eggs will have to be dropped). It would be helpful if the chicken
> users and
> hackers take a moment to consider whether this is acceptable and
> right,
> or whether we should keep the current system, which is less scalable
> in terms of modularity, but nevertheless quite stable.

You have my full support! And I'll rewrite my hygienic misc-macros to
work with ER, just to fit into the new world order ;-)

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/
Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
Blog: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/?author=4