[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:09:31 +0200 |
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 02:56 -0700 schrieb Elf:
> i explained this already.
> you want with-input-from-string.
> not call-with-input-string
and I answered already, that *I* pretty sure call-with-input-string
should be ok too, since it's just direct passing of the port instead of
passing via (current-input-port). I consider the former preferably for
readability and amount of runtime operations.
/Jörg
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, felix winkelmann, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions,
F. Wittenberger <=