[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:19:29 +0200 |
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
<address@hidden> wrote:
> BTW: I just compared with SRFI-18:
>
> (raise obj) ;procedure
>
> Calls the current exception handler with obj as the single
> argument. obj may be any Scheme object.
>
> Looks to me as if chicken was not compatible with srfi-18 either.
>
Of course it is. What makes you think it isn't?
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, Elf, 2008/07/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] catching exceptions, F. Wittenberger, 2008/07/29