[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Incremental compiling
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Incremental compiling |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:00:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
William Ramsay scripsit:
> It again compiles all the units correctly, but global constants are not
> recognized.
Right: that's because global constants are not exposed in the compiler's
output. So define them all in one short file and (include ...) that file
into each unit.
> Likewise, do I need to declare utility modules for procedures that
> are in modA but are called from modB?
No, that should not be necessary.
> This is probably all in a manual somewhere, but reading manuals are
> for wimps. Trial and error has always worked in the past...
The gods do *not* protect fools. They are protected by greater fools.
--
A rose by any other name John Cowan
may smell as sweet, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
but if you called it an onion address@hidden
you'd get cooks very confused. --RMS