[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
|
From: |
Felix |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:48:20 -0500 (EST) |
From: Jörg "F. Wittenberger" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:42:03 +0100
>>
>> The scrutinizer could give a warning in this case.
>
> If that's possible!
>
I committed a change to the "experimental" branch
(2e45f04a2facdd51d86cd38fb1ed12cdf2d85f26), please try it out, if you
like.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/20
- [Chicken-users] NE [[not exactly]]: handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/21
- [Chicken-users] Re: NE [[not exactly]]: handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, John Cowan, 2010/11/24