[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Re: NE [[not exactly]]: handling the undefined value
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Re: NE [[not exactly]]: handling the undefined value |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:52:00 -0500 (EST) |
From: Jörg "F. Wittenberger" <address@hidden>
Subject: NE [[not exactly]]: handling the undefined value
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:45:38 +0100
>
> whatever it implies!!
>
Right, it is probably not overly helpful. What a compiler does with
your code is always kind of mysterious and the implications of
optimizations may be counter-intuitive or contrary to what a user
expects. Documenting all the implications is next to im possible,
considering the heavy rewriting that takes place.
> Ohne Spaß und Englisch: Das hab' ich alles begriffen. Und ich wollte
> bitte (auch schon vorher -- aber das ist jetzt bitte nicht der nächste
> Grund für ein Mißverständnis ;-) -- mit dem "-local" meine Absicht
> ausdrücken, "was auch immer" in Deiner Dokumentation steht (siehe dort -
> und völlig egal wie <any_merkmal> es ist) bewußt "verantwortlich
> angeordnet" zu haben. (Du weißt, wer die Konsequenzen "verantwortlich"
> genannter Anordnungen zu tragen hat? ;-)
Nein, ehrlich gesagt. But anyway, I was not offended (just grumpy),
and I hope I didn't offend you. Taking the right choice in what should
be optimized and what not is something that I find very hard. I will
try to document these things more throroughly.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, John Cowan, 2010/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, Felix, 2010/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value, F. Wittenberger, 2010/11/29