Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Feb 28 2011 19:05:30 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• February 28, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfaults with shared library, foreign code, Evan Hanson, 19:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfaults with shared library, foreign code, Felix, 17:38
  • [Chicken-users] Segfaults with shared library, foreign code, Evan Hanson, 14:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alaric Snell-Pym, 09:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Christian Kellermann, 09:11
• February 27, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] scheduling and coroutines, Peter Bex, 07:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] getopt-long complains about missing property, Markus Klotzbuecher, 05:29
• February 26, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] scheduling and coroutines, Tomtom, 07:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] scheduling and coroutines, Peter Bex, 05:12
• February 25, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] scheduling and coroutines, Tomtom, 12:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] getopt-long complains about missing property, Christian Kellermann, 11:40
  • [Chicken-users] getopt-long complains about missing property, Markus Klotzbuecher, 11:20
• February 24, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Peter Bex, 03:18
• February 23, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Naitik Shah, 23:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Paul Nelson, 20:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Peter Bex, 05:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Felix, 05:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Peter Bex, 03:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Peter Bex, 03:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Felix, 02:53
• February 22, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Naitik Shah, 23:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Paul Nelson, 22:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] bind bug?, Felix, 16:00
  • Re: [Chicken-users] cvjm, Felix, 15:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Felix, 06:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Felix, 03:00
• February 21, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] bind bug?, Ross Lonstein, 09:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Peter Bex, 03:21
• February 20, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] Safely holding on to a <procedure> reference in C, Naitik Shah, 23:57
  • [Chicken-users] bind bug?, Ross Lonstein, 22:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] cvjm, John Cowan, 21:17
  • [Chicken-users] Mapping wchar_t strings, Tobia Conforto, 19:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken segfaults with large-ish inputs, Nicolas Pelletier, 19:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] cvjm, Alaric Snell-Pym, 18:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?, Alaric Snell-Pym, 17:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] cvjm, Andy Bennett, 15:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 10:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?, matt welland, 09:02
  • [Chicken-users] cvjm, Felix, 08:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken segfaults with large-ish inputs, Felix, 07:44
  • Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 06:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 05:36
• February 19, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] awful as cgi or fcgi?, matt welland, 23:41
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken for Blub Programmers, Jack Trades, 21:52
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken segfaults with large-ish inputs, Sam Hardwick, 17:57
• February 18, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Paul Nelson, 12:34
• February 17, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Mario Domenech Goulart, 16:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alaric Snell-Pym, 15:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Felix, 15:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Mario Domenech Goulart, 15:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Felix, 15:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Felix, 14:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Christian Kellermann, 11:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Andy Bennett, 11:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alex Shinn, 09:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, John Cowan, 08:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Andy Bennett, 05:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Felix, 03:45
• February 16, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alaric Snell-Pym, 18:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alaric Snell-Pym, 18:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Andy Bennett, 10:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Felix, 09:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alaric Snell-Pym, 08:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alan Post, 08:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 06:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Christian Kellermann, 05:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 05:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Ivan Raikov, 05:04
  • [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!, Alaric Snell-Pym, 04:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] display with cyclic structures or just limit on characters?, Felix, 03:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Peter Bex, 03:18
• February 15, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] display with cyclic structures or just limit on characters?, Patrick Li, 23:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records, Ivan Raikov, 20:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Jim Ursetto, 18:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Paul Nelson, 17:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records, Alex Shinn, 09:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Setting options for "make test", Sven Hartrumpf, 09:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records, Alex Shinn, 09:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Setting options for "make test", Felix, 08:32
  • [Chicken-users] Setting options for "make test", Sven Hartrumpf, 07:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Setting options for "make test", Felix, 06:32
  • [Chicken-users] Setting options for "make test", Sven Hartrumpf, 03:10
• February 14, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Thomas Hintz, 20:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Jim Ursetto, 14:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Felix, 13:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime options ignored for fixed heap and stack size in 4.6.5 ... bug, Felix, 13:10
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken Scheme 3 extension dependency problem, Paul Nelson, 11:58
  • [Chicken-users] Runtime options ignored for fixed heap and stack size in 4.6.5 ... bug, schugk, 11:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Felix, 02:56
• February 13, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records, Alex Shinn, 19:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., John Cowan, 14:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), John Cowan, 14:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), David Dreisigmeyer, 13:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Christian Kellermann, 12:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), David Dreisigmeyer, 12:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Peter Bex, 08:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Felix, 08:00
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Felix, 07:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records, Felix, 07:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Felix, 07:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Felix, 07:43
  • [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records, Ivan Raikov, 04:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Bobby Powers, 03:51
• February 12, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Taylor Venable, 18:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Patrick Li, 17:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Peter Bex, 16:51
  • [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem., Patrick Li, 16:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 15:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 14:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Peter Bex, 12:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Jim Ursetto, 12:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 12:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Peter Bex, 12:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 11:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Peter Bex, 11:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 11:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Using a macro definition within a explicit renaming macro., Patrick Li, 11:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), David Dreisigmeyer, 07:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Using a macro definition within a explicit renaming macro., Felix, 05:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Felix, 05:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), Felix, 05:11
• February 11, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), David Dreisigmeyer, 17:47
  • [Chicken-users] C_word type / Cython (warning: passing argument 2 from incompatible pointer type), David Dreisigmeyer, 16:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Using a macro definition within a explicit renaming macro., Peter Bex, 15:20
  • [Chicken-users] Using a macro definition within a explicit renaming macro., Patrick Li, 15:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Alan Post, 15:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 15:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Peter Bex, 14:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 14:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 12:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Christian Kellermann, 11:43
  • [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all, Patrick Li, 11:07
  • [Chicken-users] development snapshot 4.6.5 available, Felix, 04:48
• February 10, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Where is macroexpand?, schugk, 16:51
  • [Chicken-users] Where is macroexpand?, Patrick Li, 16:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Fixed stack size, Felix, 14:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Moritz Heidkamp, 07:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, F. Wittenberger, 06:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, F. Wittenberger, 06:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Peter Bex, 03:12
• February 09, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] Amazon S3, Thomas Hintz, 19:17
  • [Chicken-users] Fixed stack size, schugk, 14:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-iup on Windows, Tryptik, 01:51
• February 08, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Internal defines broken when compiled?, Felix, 03:48
• February 07, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Internal defines broken when compiled?, Eric Jiang, 16:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-iup on Windows, Matt Welland, 16:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] How can I get an offline version of the manual, Matt Welland, 16:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] How can I get an offline version of the manual, Jim Ursetto, 10:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-iup on Windows, Felix, 05:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Internal defines broken when compiled?, Felix, 05:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] How can I get an offline version of the manual, Felix, 05:12
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken-iup on Windows, Tryptik, 01:57
• February 06, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] is there a egg for sending smtp email?, Alex Shinn, 02:05
• February 05, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] is there a egg for sending smtp email?, Joe Python, 23:59
• February 04, 2011
  • [Chicken-users] Internal defines broken when compiled?, Eric Jiang, 11:47
• February 03, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 03:36
• February 02, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Stephen Eilert, 16:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Felix, 15:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] coops, Stephen Eilert, 13:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 12:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] coops, schugk, 09:43
• February 01, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-users] SRFI-19 Error, Kon Lovett, 20:18
  • [Chicken-users] SRFI-19 Error, Thomas Hintz, 20:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] http-client doesn't handle closed persistent connections, Peter Bex, 07:15
  • [Chicken-users] How can I get an offline version of the manual, pmarin, 06:00
  • [Chicken-users] Announce: chicken-iup installer 0.2 available, matt welland, 00:28

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc