[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Java tools
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Java tools |
Date: |
10 Jul 2001 09:29:31 -0600 |
>>>>> "Nic" == Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes:
Nic> It seems that the code doesn't really fit into any of the current
Nic> GNU projects:
Nic> - not kaffe, japhar or GCJ because it's not a compiler or VM
Nic> - not Classpath because it's not core libs
Nic> - not Classpathx because it's not an extension
Nic> I have proposed to Julian that a new GNU project be setup called:
Nic> java-tools. We can put things like javadoc and jar-tool
Nic> implementations under that project.
Nic> Does anyone have any objections to that?
I don't have a real objection. But I think that adding a new project
every time does make things more difficult. I'd prefer to see us
simply expand the mandate of, say, Classpath and then just put more
things in it.
Tom
- Java tools, Nic Ferrier, 2001/07/09
- Re: Java tools, Nic Ferrier, 2001/07/09
- Re: Java tools,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Java tools, Nic Ferrier, 2001/07/10
- Re: Java tools, Per Bothner, 2001/07/10
- Re: Java tools, Nic Ferrier, 2001/07/10
- Re: Java tools, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/11