[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Java tools
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Java tools |
Date: |
10 Jul 2001 23:33:16 -0600 |
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <address@hidden> writes:
Brian> Copyright assignment is useful for making the core libraries
Brian> legally defensible in whole from a single party, the FSF. I do
Brian> think that it has slowed the progress of the project, but I do
Brian> not know why this is so.
I think one reason is because it is a huge pain. Sometimes if you
work at a company, getting them to let you sign is a major obstacle.
Also the process itself needs streamlining. It regularly takes a
month for the paperwork to happen. People often lose interest when
nothing happens for a month. (And a month is pretty good -- sometimes
it takes much longer.)
Brian> To date I don't think we've refused to accept code under a
Brian> different license for tools. Certainly a simple javap, javah,
Brian> and javadoc would be nice to have.
javap: look at jcf-dump in gcj.
javah: look at gcjh in gcj.
Installing gcj just for these tools is a bit heavy. But hopefully
these things will start showing up in Linux distributions as standard
tools very soon.
I don't know if Sun's java[hp] are extensible from Java. If they are
then you'll be disappointed by jcf-dump and gcjh; they are written in
(sometimes poor) C.
Tom
Re: Java tools, Per Bothner, 2001/07/10
Re: Java tools, Nic Ferrier, 2001/07/10
Re: Java tools, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/11