Re: Classpath future?

[Brian Jones]

"Etienne M. Gagnon" <address@hidden> writes:

> Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Right now it is just the opposite.  Classpath is 100% JNI.  The only
> > CNI code resides in the libgcj modules that have not been merged in.
> 
> Maybe, but Classpath seems to be almost "on hold" while libgcj is going 
> "full steam", or at lest, this is the impression...

This is a little offensive.  The gcj team has been active within the
source tree and I've done what I can.  I thought you were going to
offer to help, but here you just complain.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>