[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath API javadoc
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath API javadoc |
Date: |
28 Apr 2002 14:13:20 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-04-27 at 22:21, Phillip Morelock wrote:
>
> Resultant newbie question: is it still "ok" to use sun's javadoc tool or is
> there an appropriate free tool? How do "they" (or you) generally feel about
> using non-free tools in this context? also, what is the state of such tool?
We only use proprietary tools to make sure we are compatible or
bootstrapping out of a proprietary environment. And there are some free
tools that can generate very nice documentation so please use them.
Back in October I played a bit with DoxyGen <http://www.doxygen.org/>
which is originally written for C++ but it does handle javadoc quite
nicely. Some results of running it on an old version of GNU Classpath
can be found at <http://www.klomp.org/mark/classpath/html/classes.html>.
Note that the images it generates are gifs which is frowned upon.
But even without the gifs it is nice to have that documentation.
I have not tried out the texidoclet for the Classpath Tools project yet.
Source can be found <http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/cp-tools/>
I don't know if there has been an official release yet.
Cheers,
Mark
Classpath API javadoc, John Leuner, 2002/04/26
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Tom Tromey, 2002/04/27
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Phillip Morelock, 2002/04/27
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Nic Ferrier, 2002/04/27
Re: Classpath API javadoc,
Mark Wielaard <=
Re: Classpath API javadoc, John Leuner, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Brian Jones, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Julian Scheid, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Nic Ferrier, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Julian Scheid, 2002/04/28
cp-tools, Phillip Morelock, 2002/04/28
Re: cp-tools, Brian Jones, 2002/04/28