[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath API javadoc
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath API javadoc |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:11:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
> John> I think it's a waste of all the effort that has gone into
> John> commenting code, this resource should be made available and
> John> people should be encouraged to use it.
>
> I agree. Also it will make RMS happy -- he likes it when free
> documentation is available so that people don't have to rely on the
> proprietary stuff.
Definitely.
> About a month ago I ran javadoc on the libgcj tree. There were tons
> of warnings. Also the output isn't really that good. For example,
> the first line of a description is used on the index pages; for our
> docs this line is typically not very informative, so the output is
> harder to use.
>
> I think if we ran this regularly it might help us know what needs to
> be edited. It seems to be harder to see these problems in the source
> than it is in the output.
This is my experience too.
So what do we have to do to get a cron job set up somewhere to produce a daily
javadoc run of the Classpath CVS code?
I really think this would be a worthwhile effort.
John Leuner
- Re: getting started with classpath, (continued)
Classpath API javadoc, John Leuner, 2002/04/26
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Tom Tromey, 2002/04/27
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Phillip Morelock, 2002/04/27
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Nic Ferrier, 2002/04/27
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Mark Wielaard, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc,
John Leuner <=
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Brian Jones, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Julian Scheid, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Nic Ferrier, 2002/04/28
Re: Classpath API javadoc, Julian Scheid, 2002/04/28
cp-tools, Phillip Morelock, 2002/04/28
Re: cp-tools, Brian Jones, 2002/04/28