[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:33:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2004 17:19 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > Good idea but wouldnt it be better to move all stuff from
> > SystemProperties to VMSystemProperties to make the system
> > properties fully customizable ? Perhaps some VM implements want
> > to customize the properties more, e.g. add additional properties.
>
> I considered that, but I think it would be nicer if the common
> properties stayed in the common code, but I can certainly see some
> value in making the division a little more flexible. Maybe we
> should have an additional call to VMSystemProperties at the end of
> the initializer, to allow the VM to remove or modify the
> properties?
But this needs a big fat comment so implementors find it.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
- RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/02
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/02
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06