[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:56:14 +0100 |
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 13:40, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> If nobody objects, this is going in later today.
I am a bit uneasy with this patch since it is not completely clear to me
how the VM is supposed to restrict access to the SystemProperties class.
It is a tricky interaction between the
SecurityManager.checkPackageAccess() and the way runtimes implement
method invocation on classes in different packages.
Could you describe how this precisely works?
Then we could see how hard/easy it is for the different runtimes to
actually make this work. If it is really hard then I would vote for a
different way of giving the "core classes" access to some of these
properties. My suggestion would be to add package local VMProperties
classes to each package that needs it (only 4 if I count correctly).
Cheers,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/02
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/02
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06
- RE: RFC: gnu.classpath.SystemProperties, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/06