[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mauve test question
From: |
Archie Cobbs |
Subject: |
Re: Mauve test question |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:04:57 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041129 |
Archie Cobbs wrote:
OK, here's a first stab at a new "mauve-classpath". This one is
surely out of date on several counts, but happens to be the one
I've been using for a long time.
The other thing we need to come up with is a Classpath "xfails" file,
containing those tests Classpath is known to fail. This can also serve
as a "to-do" list for Classpath hackers.
Once we agree on a "mauve-classpath" file, then we can compare our test
failures, and the failures common to all VM's is a good candidate for the
Classpath "xfails".
Once we have a Classpath "xfails", it will be much easier for VM
implementors to spot failures specific to their VM (which is the whole point).
Once the various VM implementers start using Classpath's "mauve-classpath"
and "xfails" regularly, these files should quickly converge to their correct
contents, because it will be easier to deal with the reduced amount of more
reliable information.
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
RE: Mauve test question, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/24
- Re: Mauve test question, Archie Cobbs, 2004/12/28
- Re: Mauve test question,
Archie Cobbs <=
- Re: Mauve test question, Michael Koch, 2004/12/28
- Re: Mauve test question, Archie Cobbs, 2004/12/28
- Re: Mauve test question, Michael Koch, 2004/12/28
- Re: Mauve test question, Michael Koch, 2004/12/28
- Re: Mauve test question, Archie Cobbs, 2004/12/28
- Re: Mauve test question, Michael Koch, 2004/12/28
Re: Mauve test question, Archie Cobbs, 2004/12/28
RE: Mauve test question, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/12/28