[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core Data
From: |
Ivan Vučica |
Subject: |
Re: Core Data |
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2011 20:47:43 +0200 |
Maybe I can guess: because NSObjectController is implemented there, and it has
instance methods that refer to managed object contexts.
Also, there isn't much to move (it's mostly a stubbed -initWithCoder:), since
all methods that exists are probably already in GSCoreData.
On 29. svi. 2011., at 20:39, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> Great idea, best you move the few implemented methods over to gscoredata.
> Do you remember, why you implemented that class here?
>
> On 29.05.2011 19:58, Gregory Casamento wrote:
>> gscoredata was moved to dev-libs some time ago... I will look into
>> getting rid of the implementation of NSManagedObjectContext in
>> gnustep-gui.
>>
>> GC
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ivan Vučica<ivucica@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> from what I can tell, there isn't an implementation of Core Data for
>>> GNUstep. (There does appear to be some work
>>> here: http://www.nongnu.org/gscoredata/)
>>> I'd like to point out that there is currently a class in GNUstep that makes
>>> starting such an effort a bit troublesome; that is NSManagedObjectContext in
>>> GNUstep GUI. Core Data has a class of the same name, which is essential to
>>> Core Data.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
--
Ivan Vučica
ivan@vucica.net - http://ivan.vucica.net/
Zombie Ball now available on the iPhone - http://j.mp/zombieball
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Core Data, Ivan Vučica, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, Gregory Casamento, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, Gregory Casamento, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, David Chisnall, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, Gregory Casamento, 2011/05/29
Re: Core Data, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2011/05/29