[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core Data
|
From: |
David Chisnall |
|
Subject: |
Re: Core Data |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2011 20:45:06 +0100 |
On 29 May 2011, at 20:42, Gregory Casamento wrote:
> It would lead to linker issues. I believe using id should suffice.
No it wouldn't. @class is like a typedef. It does not generate any code at
run time. The only times when you get linker issues are:
- When you create a subclass of a nonexistent class
- When you send a class message to a nonexistent class (non-fragile ABI only)
David
-- Sent from my PDP-11
- Re: Core Data, (continued)
- Re: Core Data, Gregory Casamento, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data, Gregory Casamento, 2011/05/29
- Re: Core Data,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Core Data, Gregory Casamento, 2011/05/29
Re: Core Data, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2011/05/29