[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Well its
From: |
John |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Well its |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:33:09 -0500 |
Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
> > So when do we post ours up? Well a web page, announce the
> > project and continue silently developing a better alternative :)
>
> I have put up a first version of two webpages for the DotGNU
> project a couple of minutes ago.
>
> http://dotgnu.org
>
> The Free Software Foundation is planning to put up a mirror
> somewhere at gnu.org and then mention the project in a press
> release TODAY.... things are moving fast!
Lord have mercy on our souls....
Is anyone familiar with Zygmurgy's principle of Expanding System
Dynamics? "Once you open a can of worms, you need a much larger can to
re-can them?"
Well, gentlemen and gentlewomen, we've entered a really fracking *BIG*
can of worms, or FSF opened it for us.
John Le'Brecage...
- [DotGNU]Well its, Myrddian, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its,
John <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its, John, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- [DotGNU]A good warning?, Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Dave Sherohman, 2001/07/09
- legal issues (was Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/22
- Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/09
[DotGNU]A plea for some organization., Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09