Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

dotgnu-general (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Jul 31 2001 13:45:36 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• July 31, 2001
  • [DotGNU]preventing slamming, Ron Burk, 13:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]URIs, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 13:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Rich Hilliard, 11:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Rich Hilliard, 11:14
  • [DotGNU]WANTED: Hailstorm explanation, Norbert Bollow, 10:40
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Norbert Bollow, 10:21
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 09:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]URIs, Matthias Rosenkranz, 08:50
  • [DotGNU]Encryption orthogonal to slamming, Ron Burk, 02:23
  • [DotGNU]URIs, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 01:55
• July 30, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 22:04
  • [DotGNU]Please ;), Myrddian, 20:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU..., Lloyd Llewellyn, 18:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]portable.NET, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 15:39
  • [DotGNU]portable.NET, Bill Lance, 14:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Login provider slamming., Barry Fitzgerald, 14:55
  • [DotGNU]Login provider slamming., Ron Burk, 14:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Barry Fitzgerald, 11:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, David Sugar, 11:09
  • Re: Creating "prior art" (was Re: Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz...)[DotGNU]Authent..., TonStanco, 11:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Norbert Bollow, 10:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Jeremy Petzold, 10:28
  • Re: Creating "prior art" (was Re: Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz...)[DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?), Barry Fitzgerald, 09:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Discussion list weekly summaries, Norbert Bollow, 04:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Discussion list weekly summaries, Norbert Bollow, 04:18
  • Creating "prior art" (was Re: Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz...) [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?), Norbert Bollow, 03:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU..., Barry Fitzgerald, 02:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU..., Barry Fitzgerald, 02:29
• July 29, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU..., Rhys Weatherley, 19:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]RedCarpet, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 14:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:11
  • Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was: [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?), Barry Fitzgerald, 13:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]login service slamming, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:48
  • [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was: [DotGNU..., Barry Fitzgerald, 11:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, David Sugar, 09:37
  • Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was: [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:59
• July 28, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]RedCarpet, Ted Rolle, 23:53
  • [DotGNU]RedCarpet, tali streit, 23:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, tali streit, 23:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Discussion list weekly summaries, tali streit, 23:00
  • [DotGNU]login service slamming, Ron Burk, 16:04
  • [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was: [DotGNU..., TonStanco, 15:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, John, 14:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Barry Fitzgerald, 14:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., John, 14:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Barry Fitzgerald, 13:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Barry Fitzgerald, 13:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., Norbert Bollow, 07:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Norbert Bollow, 06:11
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #68 - 16 msgs, Daniel Thomas, 03:29
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #68 - 16 msgs, Daniel Thomas, 03:25
• July 27, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils - not under the OSD., John, 16:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Jeremy Petzold, 15:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Jeremy Petzold, 14:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Jeremy Petzold, 14:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Discussion list weekly summaries, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 14:38
  • [DotGNU]DCMA devils, Ron Burk, 14:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 14:16
  • [DotGNU]Discussion list weekly summaries, Norbert Bollow, 11:29
  • Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was: [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?), Barry Fitzgerald, 10:31
  • Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was: [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?), Barry Fitzgerald, 10:20
  • Re: HTTP vs HTTPS (was Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#), Barry Fitzgerald, 09:46
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, TonStanco, 09:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #68 - 16 msgs, Jeremy Petzold, 09:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Jeremy Petzold, 08:59
  • [DotGNU]Authentication against Microsoft's "Passport" system?, Norbert Bollow, 03:25
  • HTTP vs HTTPS (was Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#), Norbert Bollow, 02:30
• July 26, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Barry Fitzgerald, 23:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Barry Fitzgerald, 23:03
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #68 - 16 msgs, Zimran Ahmed, 22:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 17:29
  • [DotGNU]Basic software that is going to be needed, meson, 17:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 15:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paying attention, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 11:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Programming Languages for the Java Virtual Machine, Norbert Bollow, 07:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Receiving two mails, Mohit Agarwal, 06:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, Norbert Bollow, 05:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Receiving two mails, Norbert Bollow, 05:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 04:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Receiving two mails, Mohit Agarwal, 04:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]What a Groove ..., Norbert Bollow, 03:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Receiving two mails, Norbert Bollow, 03:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Receiving two mails, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 03:44
  • [DotGNU]What a Groove ..., Mige Harimurti, 01:08
• July 25, 2001
  • [DotGNU]Receiving two mails, meson, 23:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, meson, 23:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, David Sugar, 22:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 21:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, Rhys Weatherley, 20:40
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 18:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 18:22
  • [DotGNU]Programming Languages for the Java Virtual Machine, Michael Knorr, 11:16
  • [DotGNU]Microsoft.NET compatibility, meson, 11:02
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Jeremy Petzold, 09:29
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), tali streit, 08:58
• July 24, 2001
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 22:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paying attention, Norbert Bollow, 08:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paying attention, tali streit, 06:17
• July 23, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, David L. Nicol, 20:04
  • Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Paying attention, Jeremy Petzold, 11:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paying attention, Norbert Bollow, 10:26
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Jeremy Petzold, 09:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paying attention, tali streit, 07:43
  • Re: Savannah [was Re: [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge], Norbert Bollow, 07:35
  • [DotGNU]Paying attention, Ron Burk, 05:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]RE: Java issues., Norbert Bollow, 05:30
  • [DotGNU]Re:, , 05:11
  • [DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility, tali streit, 04:53
  • Re: Savannah [was Re: [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge], Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 04:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]RE: Java issues., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:49
  • RE: [DotGNU]RE: Java issues., Aisha Fenton (DSL AK), 03:36
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Adam Theo, 02:49
  • [DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility, Norbert Bollow, 02:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Clarifications on FSF press release and Mono collaborations, Norbert Bollow, 02:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]RE: Java issues., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:38
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Believing .NET adoption rates, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:17
  • [DotGNU]RE: Java issues., Aisha Fenton (DSL AK), 02:10
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:09
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), tali streit, 01:40
  • [DotGNU]Believing .NET adoption rates, Ron Burk, 01:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono/DotGNU integration, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 01:16
• July 22, 2001
  • Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 21:10
  • [DotGNU]Mono/DotGNU integration, Bradley M. Kuhn, 21:10
  • Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 21:10
  • [DotGNU]Clarifications on FSF press release and Mono collaborations, Bradley M. Kuhn, 21:10
  • legal issues (was Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?), Bradley M. Kuhn, 21:10
  • Re: Savannah [was Re: [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge], Bradley M. Kuhn, 21:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Norbert Bollow, 17:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, miGlanz, 14:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, miGlanz, 14:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Norbert Bollow, 13:53
  • [DotGNU]web services, miGlanz, 11:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, miGlanz, 07:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Norbert Bollow, 06:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:37
• July 21, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Jeremy Petzold, 23:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Adam Theo, 22:48
  • [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, Ron Burk, 22:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, John, 21:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, Jeremy Petzold, 21:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, Jeremy Petzold, 21:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Hello, Jeremy Petzold, 21:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Web Services, John, 20:22
  • [DotGNU]Web Services, miGlanz, 19:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]Hello, miGlanz, 18:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Hello, Jeremy Petzold, 18:15
  • [DotGNU]Hello, miGlanz, 18:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Re: AW: dotGNU vindictive anti-mono bias, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Re: AW: dotGNU vindictive anti-mono bias, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Re: AW: dotGNU vindictive anti-mono bias, Lloyd Llewellyn, 12:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Re: AW: dotGNU vindictive anti-mono bias, Norbert Bollow, 08:27
  • Savannah [was Re: [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge], Norbert Bollow, 04:41
• July 20, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge, Jeremy Petzold, 22:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 22:29
  • [DotGNU]source code & sourceforge, static, 21:58
  • Re: [Pr]Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Keith Geffert, 16:40
  • Re: [Pr]Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Jeremy Petzold, 14:34
  • Re: [Pr]Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, tali streit, 14:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, tali streit, 13:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Jeremy Petzold, 13:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, David L. Nicol, 13:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Jeremy Petzold, 13:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, David L. Nicol, 12:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Jeremy Petzold, 12:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, John, 12:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Next week, Jeremy Petzold, 12:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Next week, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:07
  • [DotGNU]Microsoft is claiming IP on the "standards" they submitted, Jeremy Petzold, 11:44
  • Re: [DotGNU] market and features, was Next week, David Sugar, 11:15
  • Re: [DotGNU] market and features, was Next week, Juergen Sawinski, 09:57
  • [DotGNU]Next week, Jeremy Petzold, 08:43
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [Arch]Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Compatibility is king (E-Mail from RMS), tali streit, 03:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]Token System Specs, Barry Fitzgerald, 00:31
• July 19, 2001
  • [DotGNU]Productive Time, Myrddian, 23:22
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: Re: AW: dotGNU vindictive anti-mono bias, jpetzold, 22:08
  • Fwd: Re: [Arch]Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Compatibility is king (E-Mail from RMS), Jeremy Petzold, 15:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 09:24
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: Compatibility is king (E-Mail from RMS), Jeremy Petzold, 08:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 08:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 06:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), tali streit, 02:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]kerberos, jpetzold, 00:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]kerberos, David Sugar, 00:02
• July 18, 2001
  • [DotGNU]kerberos, Jeremy Petzold, 23:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Ada (was: Messaging and stuff), jpetzold, 23:03
  • [DotGNU]Ada (was: Messaging and stuff), Norbert Bollow, 22:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Adam Theo, 21:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Norbert Bollow, 21:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, John, 21:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), David Sugar, 18:46
  • [DotGNU]Please help, customer wants to buy 4million barrels of oil, Kent Nguyen, 16:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, Kent Nguyen, 16:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, David L. Nicol, 15:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, David L. Nicol, 15:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 14:44
  • [DotGNU]Token System Specs, Jeremy Petzold, 14:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 14:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 14:30
  • [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Norbert Bollow, 14:06
  • [DotGNU]Java and XP, Jeremy Petzold, 13:28
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: Apple on Board!, Kent Nguyen, 13:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 12:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 12:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 12:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 12:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 12:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 12:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 12:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 12:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 12:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, John, 11:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 11:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 11:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 11:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 11:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 11:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 11:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 11:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 11:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 11:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 10:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 10:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 10:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 10:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 09:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 09:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 09:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 09:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 09:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Adam Theo, 09:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 09:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 09:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Jeremy Petzold, 08:45
  • [DotGNU]Messaging and stuff., chainsaw2000, 08:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 08:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, David Sugar, 08:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 05:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 05:37
  • [DotGNU]GXMP released :) ... well sorta, Kent Nguyen, 05:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 04:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, Barry Fitzgerald, 02:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Barry Fitzgerald, 01:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, Myrddian, 01:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, tali streit, 01:19
  • [DotGNU]Anonymous buying, Kent Nguyen, 00:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: "resource locator strings", Kent Nguyen, 00:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: "resource locator strings", Jeremy Petzold, 00:33
• July 17, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: "resource locator strings", tali streit, 23:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Peter Saint-Andre, 22:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Adam Theo, 21:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Bradley M. Kuhn, 18:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Jeremy Petzold, 17:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, David Sugar, 17:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: "resource locator strings", Barry Fitzgerald, 17:08
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: Re: Security in SOAP?, Kent Nguyen, 16:50
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: "resource locator strings", Aaron Swartz, 15:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Johan Hanson, 15:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Jeremy Petzold, 12:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Jeremy Petzold, 12:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Barry Fitzgerald, 12:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 12:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: the hear and now, Juergen Sawinski, 10:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Jeremy Petzold, 10:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Adam Theo, 09:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Jeremy Petzold, 09:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: the hear and now, Norbert Bollow, 07:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Adam Theo, 05:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 03:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 03:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Barry Fitzgerald, 03:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]the hear and now, Kent Nguyen, 02:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 01:49
  • [DotGNU]Re: A Proposal for a Solution (Jabber), Adam Theo, 01:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Barry Fitzgerald, 01:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Barry Fitzgerald, 00:47
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Auth]the hear and now, Adam Theo, 00:27
  • [DotGNU]Re: the hear and now, Juergen Sawinski, 00:23
• July 16, 2001
  • [DotGNU]the hear and now, Jeremy Petzold, 23:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Zeph Campbell, 19:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 18:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Zeph Campbell, 17:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]A Proposal for a Solution (please read the end at least), Kent Nguyen, 15:46
  • [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 15:33
  • Re: humor: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 13:44
  • Re: humor: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Soeren Sandmann, 13:28
  • humor: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 13:13
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 13:09
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Soeren Sandmann, 13:02
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 12:13
  • Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 12:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Soeren Sandmann, 11:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 11:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, tali streit, 11:08
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]RLS, Myrddian, 10:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Myrddian, 10:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Myrddian, 10:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 10:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Norbert Bollow, 10:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Jeremy Petzold, 09:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Myrddian, 09:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Kent Nguyen, 09:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Commerce Internet, Kent Nguyen, 09:28
  • [DotGNU]Microsoft & Mono, Chris Mannall, 09:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Commerce Internet, Rich Hilliard, 08:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Jeremy Petzold, 08:36
  • Re: [DotGNU][Fwd: [Arch]Re: [Auth]a list of what we need the personal Data system to do.], John, 07:15
  • Re: [Auth]Re: [DotGNU]A Proposal for a Solution (please read the end at least), Norbert Bollow, 04:29
  • Re: [Auth]Re: [DotGNU]A Proposal for a Solution (please read the end at least), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:28
  • Re: [Auth]Re: [DotGNU]A Proposal for a Solution (please read the end at least), Adam Theo, 02:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 01:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]A Proposal for a Solution (please read the end at least), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 01:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Barry Fitzgerald, 01:13
  • [DotGNU]PKI ecosystem, Kent Nguyen, 01:04
  • [DotGNU](imprtant update on licensing!) A Proposal for a Solution, Adam Theo, 00:34
  • [DotGNU]A Proposal for a Solution (please read the end at least), Adam Theo, 00:25
• July 15, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Jeremy Petzold, 22:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: microsoft's .net, Barry Fitzgerald, 20:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Barry Fitzgerald, 20:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Away in Philly, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 20:12
  • [DotGNU]Away in Philly, David Sugar, 20:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: What is .Net?, Zeph Campbell, 18:33
  • [DotGNU]Re: What is .Net?, Bill Lance, 18:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]Re: [Auth]a list of what we need the personal Data system to do., Jeremy Petzold, 16:06
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]Re: [Auth]a list of what we need the personal Data system to do., John, 14:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Mason Ham, 14:15
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]Re: [Auth]a list of what we need the personal Data system to do., Jeremy Petzold, 13:16
  • [DotGNU][Fwd: [Arch]Re: [Auth]a list of what we need the personal Data system to do.], Jeremy Petzold, 13:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 12:57
  • Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Kent Nguyen, 11:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]microsoft's .net, Zeph Campbell, 09:17
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 08:30
  • Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Kent Nguyen, 08:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 03:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]microsoft's .net, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 02:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Mason Ham, 00:42
  • [DotGNU]XML::Simple perl Module, Jeremy Petzold, 00:26
• July 14, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Virtual Identity Ideas, Adam Theo, 23:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 23:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Kent Nguyen, 23:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 23:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 23:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Mason Ham, 23:23
  • [DotGNU]The purpose of .NET, Kent Nguyen, 21:57
  • [DotGNU]Re: microsoft's .net, William Wolf, 21:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 21:08
  • [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?, Jeremy Petzold, 21:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 21:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 20:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 20:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]microsoft's .net, Norbert Bollow, 19:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 18:44
  • [DotGNU]microsoft's .net, William Wolf, 18:04
  • [DotGNU]Re: address@hidden: Re: [Arch]Freenet], Jeremy Petzold, 17:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 16:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Jeremy Petzold, 16:25
  • Re: Fwd: Re:[DotGNU]What IS .NET really, Jeremy Petzold, 16:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Barry Fitzgerald, 15:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]DotGNU and Mozilla, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 14:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Barry Fitzgerald, 14:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Barry Fitzgerald, 14:27
  • Re: Fwd: Re:[DotGNU]What IS .NET really, Norbert Bollow, 14:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]DotGNU and Mozilla, Norbert Bollow, 13:23
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Arch]DotGNU and Mozilla, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:58
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU and Mozilla, Jeremy Petzold, 12:49
  • Re: Fwd: Re:[DotGNU]What IS .NET really, modman, 12:01
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Chris Hecimovic, 11:28
  • [DotGNU]Need for organization, Norbert Bollow, 08:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Steve Jobs interview, Norbert Bollow, 05:15
• July 13, 2001
  • [DotGNU]Steve Jobs interview, Kent Nguyen, 23:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Jeremy Petzold, 23:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), barry, 22:52
  • Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Kent Nguyen, 20:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Jeremy Petzold, 19:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Norbert Bollow, 19:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #33 - 7 msgs, Norbert Bollow, 19:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Vinko Vrsalovic B., 19:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Bill Lance, 19:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #33 - 7 msgs, John, 18:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #33 - 7 msgs, Norbert Bollow, 17:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #33 - 7 msgs, John, 16:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]FSF must die article, jcast, 11:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Norbert Bollow, 10:09
  • [DotGNU]What IS .NET, really?, Bill Lance, 09:43
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU website updated; new "website" mailing list, Norbert Bollow, 09:42
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #33 - 7 msgs, TonStanco, 06:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]FSF must die article, Martin Coxall, 06:21
  • [DotGNU]FSF must die article, Matthias Rosenkranz, 06:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]ESR on OS response to .NET (XML-RPC and SOAP), Martin Coxall, 05:19
• July 12, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Out of list (yeah, right) - Useless edits..., Mason Ham, 23:48
  • [DotGNU]ESR on OS response to .NET (XML-RPC and SOAP), Zimran Ahmed, 23:43
  • [DotGNU]Fw: - 6:30 p.m., Teresa Morris, 23:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Out of list - Useless edits..., Myrddian, 20:30
  • [DotGNU]pointers to nice things to read about "capability based security models", David L. Nicol, 19:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Out of list (yeah, right) - Useless edits..., Matthew Copeland, 19:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]Out of list (yeah, right) - Useless edits..., John, 18:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Out of list - Useless edits..., Grant Gross, 18:00
  • [DotGNU]Re: Jabber identity/authorization framework, Michael Hearn, 16:33
  • [DotGNU]Out of list - Useless edits..., John, 16:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Bradley M. Kuhn, 15:52
  • [DotGNU]Commerce Internet, Kent Nguyen, 15:41
  • [DotGNU]Source code...., Alex Vilensky, 15:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Any SOAP/UDDI/WSDL talk yet?, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 15:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Any SOAP/UDDI/WSDL talk yet?, Norbert Bollow, 14:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Any SOAP/UDDI/WSDL talk yet?, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 13:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, David Sugar, 13:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Any SOAP/UDDI/WSDL talk yet?, Martin Coxall, 13:00
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU Press Release on Community Outlets, TonStanco, 12:57
  • [DotGNU]Any SOAP/UDDI/WSDL talk yet?, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 12:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, John, 11:38
  • [DotGNU]IRC Logs, IRC bot, 10:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 09:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 07:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Martin Coxall, 05:04
• July 11, 2001
  • RE: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Radhakrishnan CV, 22:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Bradley M. Kuhn, 19:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Myrddian, 19:10
  • [DotGNU]#dotgnu on irc.openprojects.net && e-mail problems., fitzix, 18:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, David I. Lehn, 15:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Grant Gross, 15:06
  • RE: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Serge Wroclawski, 14:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), David Sugar, 14:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 14:35
  • RE: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Tony Stanco, 14:11
  • [DotGNU]If Microsoft likes Mono, can it be good for free software?, TonStanco, 13:23
  • Re: [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Matthew Copeland, 12:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), David Maurus, 11:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Martin Coxall, 11:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Grant Gross, 10:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Serge Wroclawski, 10:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Norbert Bollow, 10:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 10:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Martin Coxall, 10:28
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #26 - 6 msgs, TonStanco, 10:07
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: (DDJ) "A Ringside Seat" by Editor-in-Chief Jonathan Erickson, TonStanco, 10:07
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, TonStanco, 09:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Radhakrishnan CV, 09:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Richard Kay, 09:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Serge Wroclawski, 09:30
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, David Sugar, 09:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), David Sugar, 09:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Misc..., David Sugar, 09:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Misc..., David Sugar, 09:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Serge Wroclawski, 09:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, David Sugar, 08:56
  • [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, TonStanco, 08:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Website updated, David Sugar, 08:52
  • [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Richard Kay, 07:55
  • [DotGNU]Website updated, Norbert Bollow, 07:43
  • [DotGNU]Mailing lists, Norbert Bollow, 06:57
  • [DotGNU]third draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 06:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Development?, Norbert Bollow, 05:53
  • [DotGNU]Re: second draft for FD press release about DotGNU, TonStanco, 04:20
  • [DotGNU]Re: second draft for FD press release about DotGNU, Gordon Matzigkeit, 02:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Development?, Myrddian, 02:25
  • [DotGNU]Development?, Jesse Andrews, 02:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 01:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Misc..., Grant Gross, 01:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Misc..., Myrddian, 01:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Misc..., Myrddian, 01:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Misc..., Grant Gross, 01:22
  • [DotGNU]Misc..., David Sugar, 01:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]Virtual Identity Ideas, Myrddian, 01:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Myrddian, 00:40
• July 10, 2001
  • [DotGNU]Re: second draft for FD press release about DotGNU, Jon Babcock, 23:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS and Savannah?, Myrddian, 22:48
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, Myrddian, 22:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 22:00
  • [DotGNU]second draft for FD press release about DotGNU, Norbert Bollow, 21:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 21:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Norbert Bollow, 21:13
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, Norbert Bollow, 21:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, barry, 20:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, TonStanco, 20:09
  • Re: [DotGNU] Just for fun..., Norbert Bollow, 20:00
  • [DotGNU]Re: dotGNU question, Norbert Bollow, 19:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 18:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Matthew Copeland, 17:15
  • [DotGNU] Just for fun..., Zeph Campbell, 17:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Norbert Bollow, 17:03
  • re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, TonStanco, 16:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Ron Burk, 16:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Matthew Copeland, 15:46
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, TonStanco, 14:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 14:19
  • [DotGNU]Bending the twig of .NET (large -- sorry), Ron Burk, 14:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 14:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, fitzix, 13:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, David Sugar, 13:44
  • [DotGNU]first draft for FD press release, Norbert Bollow, 13:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., fitzix, 12:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., fitzix, 12:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 11:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS and Savannah?, fitzix, 11:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS and Savannah?, David Sugar, 11:35
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, fitzix, 11:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licensing and copyright assignment in DotGNU, fitzix, 11:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., fitzix, 11:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., fitzix, 11:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS and Savannah?, fitzix, 11:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., fitzix, 10:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Some Ideas, fitzix, 10:46
  • Re: [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] <revised> dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Matthew Copeland, 10:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 10:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 10:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 10:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 10:13
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, David Sugar, 09:56
  • [DotGNU]Re: I really would love to help on this proj, David Sugar, 09:44
  • [DotGNU]Licensing and copyright assignment in DotGNU, David Sugar, 09:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., TonStanco, 07:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 07:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., TonStanco, 07:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Some Ideas, David Sugar, 07:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 07:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Martin Coxall, 07:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono project, David O'Callaghan, 07:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., David Sugar, 07:18
  • Re: address@hidden: Re: BCEL - DotGNU], David Sugar, 07:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS and Savannah?, David Sugar, 07:13
  • address@hidden: Re: BCEL - DotGNU], Norbert Bollow, 06:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Norbert Bollow, 06:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 06:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS?, Myrddian, 05:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 05:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]XNS?, Norbert Bollow, 05:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 05:17
  • [DotGNU]XNS?, Myrddian, 04:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 04:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Myrddian, 04:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Norbert Bollow, 04:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Norbert Bollow, 03:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., Myrddian, 03:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Myrddian, 03:04
  • [DotGNU]Propoganda starts at home..., John, 01:56
  • Re: [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] <revised> dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Myrddian, 01:01
  • [DotGNU]Announcement?, Myrddian, 00:57
  • [DotGNU]Some Ideas, Myrddian, 00:56
• July 09, 2001
  • [DotGNU]Oh, followup comment, David Sugar, 21:58
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU leadership and other comments, David Sugar, 21:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono project, Myrddian, 20:45
  • [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU leadership, Myrddian, 20:21
  • [DotGNU]Virtual Identity Ideas, Adam Theo, 20:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its, Myrddian, 19:47
  • [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] <revised> dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Matthew Copeland, 19:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Myrddian, 19:07
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:36
  • Re: [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Norbert Bollow, 15:57
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, Norbert Bollow, 15:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Norbert Bollow, 14:56
  • [DotGNU]authentication system, Norbert Bollow, 14:56
  • Re: [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] and Do we have any law people around for FD?, Matthew Copeland, 14:41
  • [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?], John, 14:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Dave Sherohman, 14:30
  • [DotGNU]A good warning?, Matthew Copeland, 14:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Matthew Copeland, 14:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Matthew Copeland, 13:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its, John, 13:20
  • [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem., Matthew Copeland, 13:09
  • [DotGNU]A plea for some organization., Matthew Copeland, 12:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Norbert Bollow, 12:53
  • [DotGNU]Mono project, Norbert Bollow, 12:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its, John, 11:34
  • [DotGNU]Jabber identity/authorization framework, Norbert Bollow, 10:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Market research, Adam Theo, 06:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Well its, Norbert Bollow, 06:46
  • [DotGNU]Well its, Myrddian, 00:31
• July 08, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]Market research, Myrddian, 19:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Questions for NewsForge story, Myrddian, 19:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, Myrddian, 19:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, fitzix, 17:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, fitzix, 17:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]Questions for NewsForge story, fitzix, 17:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paranoid, fitzix, 17:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Market research, fitzix, 17:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paranoid, John, 10:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]A matter of immediate attention, David Sugar, 06:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paranoid, David Sugar, 05:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, David Sugar, 05:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A matter of immediate attention, David Sugar, 04:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, Myrddian, 01:16
• July 07, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, Myrddian, 23:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Questions for NewsForge story, Myrddian, 22:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paranoid, Myrddian, 22:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Market research, Myrddian, 22:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Paranoid, John, 21:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: A matter of immediate attention, Myrddian, 19:44
  • [DotGNU]Paranoid, Myrddian, 19:39
  • [DotGNU]Re: A matter of immediate attention, TonStanco, 15:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]A matter of immediate attention, fitzix, 14:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]IRC channel or other message forums, fitzix, 14:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, fitzix, 13:54
• July 06, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]applet-based authentication, David J. Thomson, 21:35
  • [DotGNU]A matter of immediate attention, David Sugar, 20:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]applet-based authentication, David Sugar, 18:44
  • [DotGNU]applet-based authentication, Norbert Bollow, 17:16
  • [DotGNU]Re: Fitzix Free Software Audit project and some .GNU notes., Matthew Copeland, 11:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, Norbert Bollow, 09:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]Questions for NewsForge story, Norbert Bollow, 09:40
  • [DotGNU]Project proposal: Visual development environment for DotGNU, Norbert Bollow, 09:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, Norbert Bollow, 08:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, Myrddian, 03:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, Myrddian, 03:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]ICVM?, Myrddian, 03:11
  • [DotGNU]Passport = Single Point of Failure..., John, 03:01
  • [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back, Norbert Bollow, 02:55
  • [DotGNU]ICVM?, Harshal Hayatnagarkar, 02:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, Norbert Bollow, 02:35
• July 05, 2001
  • Re: [DotGNU]IRC channel or other message forums\, Myrddian, 23:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]IRC channel or other message forums, Myrddian, 23:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]IRC channel or other message forums, Adam Theo, 22:50
  • [DotGNU]IRC channel or other message forums, Barry Fitzgerald, 22:45
  • [DotGNU]Identity/Authorization Project, Adam Theo, 21:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, Barry Fitzgerald, 21:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, Myrddian, 20:57
  • [DotGNU]Fitzix Free Software Audit project, Barry Fitzgerald, 20:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Losing momentum, Myrddian, 20:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU - Four important areas, Myrddian, 19:58
• July 02, 2001
  • [DotGNU]Re: Q: Can you build an authentication system on OS?, Norbert Bollow, 04:50

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc